Household broadband adoption
Chevy Chase Heights CDP
How many households in Chevy Chase Heights CDP, Pennsylvania report an internet subscription. These are survey estimates of what households subscribe to, not a record of which providers offer service at a given address.
Households
641
± 174
With a broadband subscription
78.6%
504 households ± 156
With no internet access
19.0%
122 households ± 90
How this compares
| Chevy Chase Heights CDP | 78.6% | |
|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania | 89.7% ± 0.1 points | not measurably different |
| United States | 91.0% ± 0.1 points | 12.4 points below |
Ranks 858 of 896 places in this state with estimates solid enough to compare.
How to read these numbers
- Every figure is a survey estimate with a margin of error at the 90% confidence level. A difference smaller than the margin is not a real difference.
- “Broadband of any type” counts cable, fibre, DSL, satellite and cellular data plans together. It does not distinguish speed or technology.
- Households reporting no internet access may still have service available to them. Adoption and availability are different measurements.
- These estimates describe households, not people, and not individual addresses.
Source
U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2024 5-year estimates, table B28002, presence and types of internet subscriptions in household.
Census place 4213400 · retrieved 2026-10-07T01:46:18Z
Change since 2018
2018 estimate
71.6%
± 10.5 points
2024 estimate
78.6%
± 11.7 points
Difference
no measurable change
The two estimates are within each other's margins of error
The two releases cover 2014–2018 and 2020–2024. They share no years, which is what makes them comparable at all. The margin on each rate is derived from the margins of both counts it came from, and the difference is tested at the same 90% confidence level the Census Bureau publishes those margins at.
Places of a similar size in Pennsylvania
Each of these publishes an estimate solid enough to set beside this one. Margins of error overlap, so a small difference between two places is not a difference.
| Place | Households | With a subscription |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo borough | 650 | 85.5% |
| Oakland CDP (Lawrence County) | 650 | 96.8% |
| Wickerham Manor-Fisher CDP | 646 | 85.6% |
| Smethport borough | 640 | 79.4% |
| Clarks Green borough | 639 | 94.8% |
| Duncannon borough | 639 | 86.1% |